Loader
↑ ↓

A World of Ice and Fire Forums

logo

Post reply

Note: this post will not display until it has been approved by a moderator.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 128 KB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by David
 - May 20, 2019, 06:22:11 PM
Is it possible that the dynamics of the Religion functionality might not seem logical in respect to castles? Especially in the context of the associated village/s not being owned by the player (having been allocated to other faction lords) and therefore precluding the option of building a religious building to evangalise the residents of the village and the associated castle pr town? Alternatively, would it be possible for the sovereign to build any (relevant) building in any faction settlement to ensure prosperity, loyalty (to the builder), and religious ferver throughout the conquered realm?
Posted by Maester Rawl
 - May 20, 2019, 06:12:46 AM
It's because they are not the same religion as yourself.
Posted by Davius
 - May 19, 2019, 11:24:13 PM
Towns captured from other factions demonstrate a degeneration in relationship (over that of the effect of the initial capture), without any logical or rational explanation.

Free Folk: Thenn, Frostfang's Camp (Captured from Free Folk - faction defeated)